Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Universities Back Gun Violence Protestors by Telling Applicants Admissions Won't be Affected

Universities Back Gun Violence Protestors by Telling Applicants Admissions Won't be Affected
(Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Student protestors against gun violence are concerned about jeopardizing their chances of getting into the college of their choice, but it seems they have an ally in the increasing number of universities who support their demonstrations.


Many students expressed their rage over America's lax gun laws, crying out, "Never again!" after the Florida shooting. The impassioned teens demanded stricter gun reform and engaged in nationwide campus walkouts on Wednesday.

Students at one high school in Texas were threatened with disciplinary action if they missed out on their classes to protest in response to the Parkland, Florida, mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14. Concerned over their admission status, the students reached out to various colleges and universities.

Curtis Rhodes, the superintendent of Needville Independent School District in Houston, Texas, was one of the first school administrators to caution the students who planned to participate in any type of protest during school hours.

Should students choose to do so, they will be suspended from school for 3 days and face all the consequences that come along with an out of school suspension.

On Wednesday, however, The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas reminded Rhodes that prohibiting students from expressing political concerns and punishing them accordingly for protesting was illegal.



Rest assured, college hopefuls received comforting news.

According to WBUR, at least a dozen New England universities issued statements expressing that protest participation is up to the discretion of each student. The universities also assured students who actively engaged in the gun reform rallies that their applications won't be affected.



In MIT's acceptance letter, applicants are not obligated to disclose their disciplinary actions from protesting after submission, but the university maintains the right to rescind admission.

In a blogpost, MIT Dean of Admissions and Student Financial Services, Stu Schmill, addressed the concerns of admitted students who have a history of being involved in protests.

[A] disciplinary action associated with meaningful, peaceful participation in a protest will not negatively impact their admissions decision, because we would not view it as inappropriate or lacking integrity on its face.

Schmill added:

[W]e hold our students to a high standard and give them a wide berth," Schmill went on. "It would be at best quixotic, and at worst hypocritical, if we treated our applicants differently, penalizing them for engaging in responsible, responsive citizenship as the students at Stoneman Douglas and elsewhere have done.

Boston University's Associate Vice President for Enrollment and Dean of Admissions, Kelly A. Walter, wrote a statement for their website:

Boston University believes that every student should expect a safe school environment in which to learn and study. We stand in support of every high school student who chooses to participate in peaceful protests, such as the March For Our Lives and the National School Walkout Day, or who thoughtfully and respectfully exercise their freedom of expression.

Other universities showed their encouragement in the fight for safer schools. University of Connecticut assured students not to worry about their admissions.





Worcester Polytechnic Institute said they base their decisions on "their values & principles."


WPI's Dean of Admissions, Andrew Palumbo tweeted:






University of Massachusetts at Amherst also said the applications of students who protested won't be affected.



In response to a critic who accused the University of "pushing a leftist agenda," UMass set the record straight with this tweet:



H/T - HuffingtonPost, Twitter, WBUR,

More from

Donald Trump with King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands and Queen Maxima
Brendan Smialowski - Pool/Getty Images

Dutch Queen Appears To Mockingly Mimic Trump Right In Front Of Him In Hilarious Viral Video

Queen Maxima of the Netherlands has gone viral after she was caught on video appearing to mock the way President Donald Trump speaks while he was in conversation with her and her husband King Willem-Alexander at the Huis ten Bosch Palace in The Hague, where world leaders have attended the NATO summit.

The moment came as Trump spoke to Williem-Alexander to thank the royal couple for their hospitality. The Queen was actively listening to the two men talk but then turned her face toward the cameras, twisting her mouth to resemble Trump's speaking style.

Keep ReadingShow less

Teachers Share The Questions Students Asked In Class That Broke Their Hearts

Being a teacher is a calling.

It is not for the meek or weak of heart.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Emily Compagno
Fox News

Fox Host Slams Dem For Dropping An F-Bomb After Praising Trump For The Same Thing Just Minutes Earlier

Fox News host Emily Compagno was criticized after she praised Donald Trump's use of the "f-bomb" earlier this week before condemning Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett's use of the same word—on the same episode of her show, no less.

Trump made headlines this week after admonishing Israel and Iran for violating a ceasefire agreement he'd announced on Truth Social. Although he claimed the ceasefire had been "agreed upon," Iran fired at least six missile barrages at Israel after it was supposed to take effect.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ken Jennings; Emily Croke
@Jeopardy/Instagram

Champ's Wild Final Jeopardy Connection

In a dramatic conclusion on last Monday’s Jeopardy!, a contestant revealed a surprising relationship to the final clue's answer. Hailing from Denver, Emily Croke made it to the final write-in portion of the game show with $12,200 in earnings.

In the category of “Collections,” host Ken Jennings read the clue:

Keep ReadingShow less
State Department logo illustration
Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

State Department Slammed After Requiring Visa Applicants To Make All Social Media Posts Public For Vetting

The State Department is facing harsh criticism after it announced that anyone applying for an F, M, or J nonimmigrant visa will need to disclose all social media profiles from the last five years, requiring that all applicants set their posts to public so they can be properly vetted by its agents.

The agency said the new rules are part of a new screening process aimed at identifying individuals who may pose a threat to U.S. national security. According to the department, failure to comply could result in a denial, and consular officers have been instructed to flag signs of “hostility” toward the U.S.—though the criteria for such determinations remain vague.

Keep ReadingShow less