Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

All-You-Can-Eat Restaurant Sparks Debate By 'Charging Extra' If Diners Don't Finish Food

Screenshots from mikasahanma's TikTok video
@mikasahanma/TikTok

Restaurant worker @mikasahanma explained in a viral video on TikTok how diners at her restaurant can eat as much food as they want, but will face an extra charge if they leave any leftovers.

Make us preferred on Google

There's a concept of our eyes being "bigger than our stomach," and for good reason. Sometimes when we go to a restaurant, and especially when it's an all-you-can-eat-style restaurant, it's easy to load up a plate with all of the food that we want, not what we're capable of eating.

TikToker @mikasahanma said that the restaurant she works for combats this overconsumption by charging extra for food that is ordered but not eaten, to shrink down potential food waste.


While preparing a beetroot for a variety of sushi dishes, the TikToker specified the difference between "all you can eat" as opposed to "all you can order."

"Leftover food costs extra in our restaurant. If you cannot finish the food you ordered, you have to pay for that food."
"Why do you have to pay extra? You already paid for the food, right?"
"We have a special concept. We offer all-you-can-eat at our restaurant. First, you pay 30 euros, and then you have 90 minutes to eat as much as you want. All you can eat!"
"But the name of our concept is 'all you can eat,' not 'all you can order' or 'all you can take with you.'"

You can watch the video here:

@mikasahanma

#viral #mikasa

Some TikTokers reassured the employee that this concept made sense.

@mikasahanma/TikTok

@mikasahanma/TikTok

@mikasahanma/TikTok

@mikasahanma/TikTok

@mikasahanma/TikTok

In another video, @mikasahanma explained further that the onus of not wasting food fell on the customer, not the restaurant.

"'Charging extra for leftovers is wasting food.'"
"I know where this thought comes from. However, you first have to understand our concept."
"We offer 'all you can eat,' and everything you cannot finish, you have to pay extra. And if you pay extra, you can take it with you. But you have to pay extra if you want to take it home or not."
"Accusing us for the wasted food does not really make sense, because the people order themselves the food that they cannot finish. Our guests are responsible for themselves and ordering just as much as they can eat."
"And if you don't finish something because you don't like the taste of it, you obviously don't have to pay extra."
"But when you leave big portions of food, it's a difference between leaving something, and it's obvious that you tried it and you didn't like it, or just ordering way too much because your eyes were bigger than your stomach."

You can watch the video here:

@mikasahanma

#viral #mikasa

Some TikTokers continued to nod in agreement with the concepts from the video.

@mikasahanma/TikTok

@mikasahanma/TikTok

@mikasahanma/TikTok

@mikasahanma/TikTok

@mikasahanma/TikTok

While the TikToker continued to argue for her restaurant's model of payment, most of the commenters agreed with the concept and said they had seen this done in restaurants across Europe, Japan, and even some all-you-can-eat buffets in the United States.

It's a great practice in encouraging customers to order what they can eat, with the invitation for them to order more if they feel up to it—without wasting so much food.

More from Trending

Screenshots from @nataliemeansnice's TikTok
@nataliemeansnice/TikTok

Mom Goes Viral After Realizing She Spent Halloween Event With White Lips After Hilarious Mix-Up

Halloween is meant to be all fun and games, but people say, "Trick or treat!" for a reason!

Mom and TikToker Natalie Drue, or @nataliemeansnice on the social media platform, went to a candy-free trunk-or-treat event with her 2-year-old daughter, where they toured a variety of trunks presented by local businesses, corporations, and members of the neighborhood.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ariana Grande
Taylor Hill/FilmMagic

Ariana Grande Caught Liking Instagram Post Hilariously Trolling Republicans After Midterms—And Fans Are Applauding

Most celebrities haven't had the gall to stand for anything since Trump took office, but in the wake of Tuesday's midterms some of them are showing exactly where they stand, even if in the subtlest of ways.

Case in point: Ariana Grande, who was caught liking an Instagram post that used one of her performances to hilariously troll Republicans, and fans are loving it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Katie Miller
CBS News

Katie Miller Reveals That She Didn't Actually Vote In The Midterms—And Her Reason Is Getting Major Side-Eye

Controversial Republican President Donald Trump's MAGA movement took a major hit in the midterms.

For some inexplicable reason, Bari Weiss' CBS News decided Katie Miller, the wife of Trump White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and the Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller, was the expert to consult on why Tuesday's results went so badly for her husband's boss and her husband's Project 2025 Christian nationalist, White supremacist agenda.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

Dems Share Important Reminder As Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' Is Set To Take Effect In January

After Democrats swept midterm election races to win back both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in a clear repudiation of the Trump administration, people are sharing reminders that President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" is set to take effect in January and that Americans could blame Democrats for stipulations Republicans put in the bill.

According to The Washington Post, the bill "includes the biggest reduction of funding for the federal safety net since at least the 1990s, targeting more than $1 trillion in social spending." The Post noted that the $3 trillion package "partially pays for its large price tag by slashing spending on Medicaid and food stamps (SNAP), which congressional Republicans maintain are rife with fraud."

Keep ReadingShow less
James Talarico; Ken Paxton
Sergio Flores/Getty Images; Adam Gray/Getty Images

Texas Election Results Reveal Just How Badly James Talarico Beat Ken Paxton—And We Love To See It

While election results in Texas have still not been fully tallied, the unofficial results have revealed that the election between Democrat James Talarico and Republican Ken Paxton in the race for the U.S. Senate was over before Election Day even hit because Talarico received more early votes than Paxton received in total.

The scale of Talarico’s victory was evident in the early-voting figures. He received 5,444,982 votes overall, including 4,397,474 cast before Election Day. Paxton, by comparison, finished with 4,249,373 votes, of which 3,232,667 were early ballots. In other words, Talarico secured nearly 150,000 more votes during early voting alone than Paxton received across the entire election.

Keep ReadingShow less