Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know Why Trump's Legal Team Is Handing So Many Documents Over to Robert Mueller

We Now Know Why Trump's Legal Team Is Handing So Many Documents Over to Robert Mueller
(Photos by Jim Watson/AFP and Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Understandable.

After attempting to limit the scope of any Robert Mueller interview with President Donald Trump by offering a sit-down in exchange for terms and concessions failed to bear fruit, Trump's personal lawyers recently began a new tactic to protect their employer: full(ish) disclosure. Trump’s attorneys turned over written descriptions of key moments under investigation in the Russia probe.

Trump told aides he is “champing at the bit” to sit for an interview, but his lawyers would prefer he not, at least not without some limits in place. Through providing written descriptions, Mueller's office should not need to ask what they already know, thus limiting the scope and duration of any Trump interview.


The descriptions include only summaries of internal memos and correspondence about events. The president's legal team worry that Trump, who admits to making false claims, may do so in an hours-long or in-depth interview.

“We have very constructive, productive communications with the special counsel and his colleagues,”  said John Dowd, an attorney and legal team spokesman for the president. He declined comment on records provided to Mueller.

We’re blessed to have them (communications with Mueller's team). I think it’s helpful to them and of course I think it’s very helpful to us.”

The Office of Special Counsel declined to comment on any communications or exchange of information with the president's personal lawyers.

According to a report from the Washington Post, special counsel investigators told Trump’s lawyers their main questions regarding the president fall into two categories: “What did he do?” and “What was he thinking when he did it?”

Trump’s lawyers expect Mueller to ask Trump if he knew about Flynn’s communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the transition phase between the election and inauguration. What instructions the president gave Flynn about the contact are also of concern.

In February, Trump said he fired Flynn after he misled Vice President Pence about his Russian contacts.

As part of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, certain White House firings appear suspicious. In addition to focusing on Trump’s firing of his national security adviser, Flynn, Mueller's team is looking into possible obstruction of justice through efforts to halt the investigation, namely by firing FBI director James Comey.

At the time, the president claimed he fired Comey because of mishandling in the investigation of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

The records provided to Mueller are not summaries of Trump’s personal version of events but rather a generic White House view. Trump’s legal team hopes the documents eliminate the need to ask the president about some events.

The president continues to deny any wrongdoing, calling the investigation a “witch hunt” since May. Over the weekend the president sounded off on Mueller's team again.

However, in each case, Twitter was quick to correct the president.

More from People/donald-trump

Kate Gosselin
Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images

Kate Gosselin Shares The 'Lasting Effects' Of Having Sextuplets On Her Body—And We Can Only Imagine

TLC programming was a major part of Millennial and Gen-X culture, particularly shows like Teen Mom, Catfish, Jon & Kate Plus 8, and Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

If you were ever curious for a closer glimpse of Kate Gosselin, mother of twins and then sextuplets, and her life, now is your chance!

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris presidential debate
CNN

Video Of Kamala Warning Trump About Putin's Agenda Goes Viral After Russian Drones Enter Polish Airspace

One year ago, pundits and the press were analyzing the performances of Democratic presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harris and former President and MAGA Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump in the first and only debate between the pair before the 2024 presidential election.

During that face-off, it was noted that Trump refused to answer if he wanted United States ally Ukraine to win the war Russia began by invading their neighbor.

Keep ReadingShow less
An 87-year-old Gramercy Park man and his wife fought off a pair of watch thieves in a scam gone wrong.
Eyewitness News ABC7NY/YouTube

87-Year-Old Foils Watch Thieves

Who needs another season of Mr. and Mrs. Smith when Gramercy Park’s own Larry Schwartz and Joanna Cuccia are already serving action-comedy gold? At 87, Schwartz casually knocks out 240 reps a day and chases off watch thieves as if it were just another warm-up set.

And Larry Schwartz wasn’t about to let some Rolex-swapping grifter make him the punchline of a TikTok crime wave.

Keep ReadingShow less
Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic
Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images; 20th Century Fox

Anna Wintour Reveals Her Honest Reaction To Seeing 'The Devil Wears Prada'—And It's Kind Of Iconic

If you've ever wondered if legendary Vogue Editor-in-Chief Anna Wintour has ever seen The Devil Wears Prada, the answer is yes, and she's finally shared her opinions on the film.

The movie, based on Lauren Weisberger's novel of the same name, centers around the trials and tribulations a young writer endures under a legendarily icy fashion editor named Miranda Priestley.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Sonia Sotomayor, Stephen Colbert, and crowd giving standing ovation
CBS

Powerful Line From Sotomayor's Scathing Dissent After ICE Ruling Ignites Standing Ovation On 'Colbert'

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received a standing ovation during her appearance on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert after Colbert read a line from her powerful dissent following the Court's ruling that immigration agents can use racial profiling when conducting arrests.

The case was brought by several individuals detained during ICE raids. A federal district judge initially found the raids unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Keep ReadingShow less