Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How Many Americans Would Need to Upload Their Genetic Information to Genealogy Sites for Anyone to Be Identified, and We're Getting Close

Hits close to home.

Unless you have an identical twin, your DNA sequencing is completely unique. However, despite this uniqueness, your genetic privacy may still be at risk.

[embed]

[/embed]


According to a new study, more than half of all Americans could potentially be identified by name. All that would be needed is a sample of DNA and a handful of simple facts, such as age and approximate region of residency.

Although doing so would be extremely expensive, the concept requires us all to reexamine the meaning of privacy in the digital age, where science and technology are advancing every day. For both scientists and biotech companies, the proliferation in DNA acquirement can be seen as a response to the usefulness of that genetic information.

DNA is now a hot commodity. According to researchers, once 3 million Americans have uploaded their genic profiles into public genealogy websites, then nearly everyone in this country would be identifiable by their DNA. Again, all that would be needed are a few extra, basic clues.

At this time, more than one million Americans have already uploaded their genetic profiles into public databases, through sites such as 23andMe. It is just a matter of time before everyone will be identifiable by DNA profile.

“People have been wondering how long it will be before you can use DNA to detect just about anybody. The authors are saying it’s not going to take that long,” said Ruth Dickover, director of the forensic science program at UC Davis. Dickover was not involved in this study.

This rise in proliferation and concern is due to two distinct trends.

The first is the rise of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Ancestry.com and 23andMe both provide inexpensive options for DNA tests. All that is required is approximately $100 and a saliva sample.

The second trend is the rise in publicly searchable genealogy databases. GEDmatch is one such example. Any individual can upload a DNA profile to this site. Once that occurs, computers will delineate far-reaching branches of a family tree. Essentially, these sites can connect an individual, through DNA, to any individual they may be related to.

A group of researchers, led by Columbia University computer scientist Yaniv Erlich, set up an experiment designed to determine if an individual's identity could be determined through a sample of DNA and a basic amount of biographical information.

After an extensive and detailed process, researchers were indeed able to correctly identify the identity of the owner of the DNA sample.

DNA profiling, while new, has been used in solving crimes. In April, Joseph James DeAngelo (a.k.a, the Golden State Killer) was charged with 13 counts of murder and 13 counts of attempted kidnapping. Law enforcement officials used a publically available DNA database to catch DeAngelo. It is only the second time in history that particular strategy has been successful. Since then, 13 more accused criminals have been caught using the same methodology.

“The solving of the Golden State Killer case opened this method up as a possibility and other crime labs are taking advantage of it,” Dickover said. “Clearly a trend has started.”

However, this strategy can easily be manipulated if it falls into nefarious hands.

“When the police caught the Golden State Killer, that was a very good day for humanity,” Erlich said. “The problem is that the very same strategy can be misused.”

Erlich and his co authors suggest that direct-to consumer companies implement mitigation strategies that would help to curb potential abuse. It is easy to see how DNA sequencing could potentially be used as a consequential profiling tactic.

More from News

Signal app logo; J.D. Vance
Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images; Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Signal's Founder Epically Roasts Vance Over The Disastrous Group Chat Debacle

Signal founder Matthew Rosenfeld, better known by the pseudonym Moxie Marlinspike, mocked Vice President J.D. Vance after the app found itself at the center of the Trump administration's group text scandal.

Rosenfeld's post came amid revelations that Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was invited into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials, particularly Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, discussing military strategy surrounding war strikes in Yemen.

Keep ReadingShow less
MTG, Martha Kelner
C-SPAN

MTG Blasted For Her Unhinged Reaction To A UK Reporter Asking Her A Question

Far right Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene was bashed for viciously shutting down a British reporter who had a question about the Signal group chat scandal, AKA "Signalgate."

Republican President Donald Trump's administration continues to downplay concerns after The Atlantic'seditor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, was mistakenly added to the Signal messaging app's group chat in which U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shared with top intelligence officials the specific weapons programs regarding the U.S. war strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Rachel Maddow
MSNBC

Rachel Maddow Gives Trump A Blistering Reality Check After His 'Perfect' Presidency Claims

MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow criticized President Donald Trump after he claimed "we've had two perfect months" to start out his presidency—conveniently downplaying "Signalgate" and ignoring all the scandals that have thus far struck his administration.

You can see his comments to reporters in the video below:

Keep ReadingShow less
train crossing in small town
craig kerwien on Unsplash

People Share Their Most Embarrassing Small Town Stories

I lived most of my life in a very small town in Northern Maine. There were about 200 kids in my high school and there were 56 kids in my graduating class—we were tied with the class of 1961 for the largest class ever.

When the primary employer in town—Pinkham Lumber Mill—shut down, the town got even smaller. Now the senior class is considered large if it reaches double digits.

Keep ReadingShow less
A post-it with "I Quit" written on it over a computer keypad
a yellow notepad on a keyboard
Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

People Reveal Why They Quit Their Job On The First Day

As much as anyone may want to quit a job, at the end of the day it's easier said than done.

For one thing, even if people are working soul-sucking jobs that barely cover expenses, they still can't afford to lose the paycheck, until something better comes along.

Keep ReadingShow less