Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

We Now Know How Many Americans Would Need to Upload Their Genetic Information to Genealogy Sites for Anyone to Be Identified, and We're Getting Close

Hits close to home.

Unless you have an identical twin, your DNA sequencing is completely unique. However, despite this uniqueness, your genetic privacy may still be at risk.

[embed]

[/embed]


According to a new study, more than half of all Americans could potentially be identified by name. All that would be needed is a sample of DNA and a handful of simple facts, such as age and approximate region of residency.

Although doing so would be extremely expensive, the concept requires us all to reexamine the meaning of privacy in the digital age, where science and technology are advancing every day. For both scientists and biotech companies, the proliferation in DNA acquirement can be seen as a response to the usefulness of that genetic information.

DNA is now a hot commodity. According to researchers, once 3 million Americans have uploaded their genic profiles into public genealogy websites, then nearly everyone in this country would be identifiable by their DNA. Again, all that would be needed are a few extra, basic clues.

At this time, more than one million Americans have already uploaded their genetic profiles into public databases, through sites such as 23andMe. It is just a matter of time before everyone will be identifiable by DNA profile.

“People have been wondering how long it will be before you can use DNA to detect just about anybody. The authors are saying it’s not going to take that long,” said Ruth Dickover, director of the forensic science program at UC Davis. Dickover was not involved in this study.

This rise in proliferation and concern is due to two distinct trends.

The first is the rise of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Ancestry.com and 23andMe both provide inexpensive options for DNA tests. All that is required is approximately $100 and a saliva sample.

The second trend is the rise in publicly searchable genealogy databases. GEDmatch is one such example. Any individual can upload a DNA profile to this site. Once that occurs, computers will delineate far-reaching branches of a family tree. Essentially, these sites can connect an individual, through DNA, to any individual they may be related to.

A group of researchers, led by Columbia University computer scientist Yaniv Erlich, set up an experiment designed to determine if an individual's identity could be determined through a sample of DNA and a basic amount of biographical information.

After an extensive and detailed process, researchers were indeed able to correctly identify the identity of the owner of the DNA sample.

DNA profiling, while new, has been used in solving crimes. In April, Joseph James DeAngelo (a.k.a, the Golden State Killer) was charged with 13 counts of murder and 13 counts of attempted kidnapping. Law enforcement officials used a publically available DNA database to catch DeAngelo. It is only the second time in history that particular strategy has been successful. Since then, 13 more accused criminals have been caught using the same methodology.

“The solving of the Golden State Killer case opened this method up as a possibility and other crime labs are taking advantage of it,” Dickover said. “Clearly a trend has started.”

However, this strategy can easily be manipulated if it falls into nefarious hands.

“When the police caught the Golden State Killer, that was a very good day for humanity,” Erlich said. “The problem is that the very same strategy can be misused.”

Erlich and his co authors suggest that direct-to consumer companies implement mitigation strategies that would help to curb potential abuse. It is easy to see how DNA sequencing could potentially be used as a consequential profiling tactic.

More from News

Michael Glantz is seen eating during the WHCD chaos in a moment that quickly went viral.
@ChrisStephensMD/X; @whcinsider/Instagram

Guy Who Was Caught On Camera Still Eating During Correspondents' Dinner Chaos Explains His Actions

While most attendees hit the floor during a chaotic moment at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, Michael Glantz stayed exactly where he was—fork in hand. After the clip made the rounds online, the Creative Artists Agency (CAA) agent is now explaining why he didn’t move.

Glantz was caught on C-SPAN cameras remaining in his seat and even taking a few bites of his spring pea and burrata salad as chaos unfolded around him.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump; Norah O'Donnell
60 Minutes/CBS

Trump Just Responded To The Correspondents' Dinner Shooter's Manifesto—And Norah O'Donnell's Reaction Is Priceless

On Sunday, MAGA Republican President Donald Trump sat down with CBS News 60 Minutes correspondent Norah O'Donnell to discuss the events of the previous night at the 2026 White House Correspondents' Dinner (WHCD).

The Trump administration had already done a press conference the night before when Trump used the opportunity to push for construction to resume on his $400 million vanity project, his golden ballroom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Todd Blanche, Donald Trump, and Kash Patel
The White House/YouTube

Trump Just Shared Why He's Actually 'Honored' By The Multiple Attempts On His Life—And Yikes

On Saturday night, after an armed individual gained access to the Washington Hilton hotel where the 2026 White House Correspondents' Dinner (WHCD) was taking place, MAGA Republican President Donald Trump gave an impromptu press conference at the White House.

According to police, an alleged assassin armed with multiple weapons exchanged gunfire with law enforcement in the Washington Hilton's lobby before being tackled. The incident raised questions about security protocols in the publicly accessible areas surrounding the event, with multiple reports stating security seemed more lax than prior WHCDs attended by sitting Presidents.

Keep ReadingShow less
Melania Trump; Jimmy Kimmel
Mandel NGAN / AFP via Getty Images; ABC

Melania Gets Brutal Reminder After Accusing Jimmy Kimmel Of 'Hateful And Violent Rhetoric'

If there's one thing we all know about MAGA it's that they can dish it, but they absolutely cannot take it. And First Lady Melania Trump is the latest to prove it.

The President's wife is hoppin' mad at Jimmy Kimmel for his joke about her in a sketch on his show about the White House Correspondents' Association dinner just days before the shooting that occurred there.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kash Patel, Donald Trump, and Markwayne Mullin press briefing
C-SPAN

Trump Slammed After Using Correspondents' Dinner Shooting As Reason For Why He 'Needs' To Build His New Ballroom

A false flag is defined by Webster's dictionary as a hostile act intentionally designed to "manipulate public perception, create false culpability, or justify retaliatory actions." The phrase is getting a workout online by more than conspiracy theorists after a press conference by MAGA Republican President Donald Trump on Saturday night.

That night, Trump was slated to attend and speak at his first White House Correspondents' Dinner (WHCD) as President. Each year of his first term and in 2025, he denigrated the WHCD and refused to attend.

Keep ReadingShow less