Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

A Safe and Effective Male Birth Control Pill Could Be on the Market Sooner Than We Thought

A group of Australian experts suggest that an effect method of male contraception is imminent.

Could male contraception finally become a reality? That is what a group of Australian scientists believe; that a safe and effective method of male contraception will become available- a method that is free of significant long-term side effects.

For a long time now, the onus of contraception has been placed solely on females. In recent years, attempts have been made to bridge the gap in responsibility between men and women. In 2016, NPR reported that a study focusing on a male contraceptive in hormone form was essentially killed, after men in the study reported a plethora of side effects as a result of the hormone injection.


The irony is not lost. The implication suggests that men should not have to bear the burden of contraceptives, if they have to experience side effects. However, women have experienced countless side effects from contraceptive devices, including the pill, the IUD and other forms of birth control for decades.

The study was promising. Initial results suggested that the hormone injections would be 96% effective in preventing pregnancy. However, a slew of side effects including acne, mood swings and depression killed the forward momentum of the study. Even more so, previous efforts have had a drastic effect on sex drive, a consequence that some men seem to be unwilling to endure.

Of course, there was a great deal of eye rolling on the internet in response to the killed study. Memes were shared and strong opinions were articulated across various social media platforms. Women have experienced mood swings, decreased sex drive and weight gain as a result of decades of societally imposed birth control. Many people argued that like many things in life, women are expected to carry these kinds of responsibilities, which is a glaring example of institutionalized male privilege.

Some experts say, however, that the study was dropped for legitimate reasons.

According to Dr. Doug Colvard, Ph.D., deputy director of programs for Conrad (a co-sponsor of the study), "The men participating voted with their feet if they didn't find the side effects acceptable. They withdrew from the study," said Colvard. "But by far the vast majority of the men continued in the study even though they were experiencing mild or moderate adverse events."

Dr. Jennifer Gunter, OB-GYN, agrees that it is inappropriate to hyperbolize the ending of such a study. “This is an early study of a new drug, and there are so many things we don't know about it. You need to compare that with an equivalent study of birth control to have a comparison. But I don't believe that there's some kind of medical conspiracy to protect men from birth control side effects."

According to these experts, the dissolution of a trial is common in the world of drug research and development.

In the current Australian study, researchers hope that their form of contraception will have fewer potential side effects—a goal for any emerging drug breakthrough. This particular method focuses on two proteins that trigger the transport of sperm. By essentially deactivating these proteins, sperm will become unable to leave the body. This potential methodology is considered much safer than the so-called male contraceptive pill, which posed a great risk of side effects ranging from irreversible sterility to potential both defects.

"Previous strategies have focused on hormonal targets or mechanisms that produce dysfunctional sperm incapable of fertilisation, but they also often interfere with male sexual activity and cause long-term irreversible effects on fertility. With this non-hormonal approach, sperm are unaffected so the contraception is likely to be readily reversible once the medication has been stopped," said senior researcher for the Australian study, Sad Ventura.

If the current stage of the trial goes well, researchers are hopeful that clinical trials will start soon. If all goes according to plan, this male form of contraception could be on the market within 5-10 years.

If anything, this method sounds less radical than another potential form of male birth control. That method, as discovered by scientists, involves using African plant extracts traditionally used by warriors as a heart-stopping poison.

If past behavior is any indicator, most will likely opt for the radically safer and reversible form of contraception.

More from News

Jasmine Crockett Calls Out Trump's Hypocrisy By Pointing Out How Melania Got Her Visa
Leigh Vogel/Getty Images for SiriusXM; Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images

Jasmine Crockett Calls Out Trump's Hypocrisy By Pointing Out How Melania Got Her Visa

Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett pointed out President Donald Trump's hypocrisy on immigration considering how First Lady Melania Trump's pathway to citizenship was possible because she received an "Einstein visa," which is usually reserved for an individual with "some sort of significant achievement."

Speaking during a House Judiciary Committee hearing titled “Restoring Integrity and Security to the Visa Process,” Crockett noted that “the idea that Trump and my Republican colleagues want to restore integrity and security in the visa process is actually a joke," and harshly criticized the Trump administration's immigration crackdown and visa restrictions.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Jennifer Griffin and Pete Hegseth
The Hill

Fox Host Comes To Reporter's Defense After Pete Hegseth Berates Her At Pentagon Briefing

Fox News' chief political analyst Brit Hume came to the defense of Fox national security reporter Jennifer Griffin after their former colleague, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, criticized Griffin as the reporter "who misrepresents the most intentionally what the president says” in a Pentagon news conference.

Hegseth, a former Fox News anchor, had criticized media outlets—including his former network—for what he described as unpatriotic reporting. Hegseth took particular aim at early intelligence assessments suggesting that President Donald Trump's bombing of Iran may not have significantly crippled Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

Keep ReadingShow less

Teachers Share The Questions Students Asked In Class That Broke Their Hearts

Being a teacher is a calling.

It is not for the meek or weak of heart.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Emily Compagno
Fox News

Fox Host Slams Dem For Dropping An F-Bomb After Praising Trump For The Same Thing Just Minutes Earlier

Fox News host Emily Compagno was criticized after she praised Donald Trump's use of the "f-bomb" earlier this week before condemning Texas Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett's use of the same word—on the same episode of her show, no less.

Trump made headlines this week after admonishing Israel and Iran for violating a ceasefire agreement he'd announced on Truth Social. Although he claimed the ceasefire had been "agreed upon," Iran fired at least six missile barrages at Israel after it was supposed to take effect.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ken Jennings; Emily Croke
@Jeopardy/Instagram

Champ's Wild Final Jeopardy Connection

In a dramatic conclusion on last Monday’s Jeopardy!, a contestant revealed a surprising relationship to the final clue's answer. Hailing from Denver, Emily Croke made it to the final write-in portion of the game show with $12,200 in earnings.

In the category of “Collections,” host Ken Jennings read the clue:

Keep ReadingShow less