Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Trump's NIH Just Expanded the Study of Certain Viruses, But Did They Put Humanity at Risk?

Trump's NIH Just Expanded the Study of Certain Viruses, But Did They Put Humanity at Risk?
Andie Vaught, 25, grasps a stress toy in the shape of a truck as she prepares to have her blood drawn by phlebotomist Catina Boyd as part of a clinical trial for a Zika vaccine at the National Institute of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland, November 21, 2016. (Allison Shelley/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Trump administration lifts a ban on research that could lead to a man-made pandemic.

Each year, the epidemiology community keeps a close eye on the flu, a virus that is famous for mutating and changing in its severity and ability to spread. This year is an especially auspicious year for contemplating influenza: 100 years ago, the Spanish Flu outbreak of 1918 killed millions of people around the world. Studying these viruses can alert the medical and scientific communities in time to stop such an outbreak from devastating humanity again.

However, studying viruses can be a tricky business. In 2014, University of Wisconsin flu experts created a “mutant” version of the 1918 flu virus, and discovered that strains of the original 1918 version still exist in the environment. Since even the strictest lab protocols can’t promise that such a virus won’t escape, this development sparked debate which prompted the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to issue a moratorium on continued studies on infectious diseases. Scientists argued that if we don’t study viruses, we won’t understand how to combat them when they inevitably occur in human and agricultural populations.


"Because avian influenza viruses in nature require only a few changes to adapt to humans and cause a pandemic, it is important to understand the mechanisms involved in adaptation and identify the key mutations so we can be better prepared," said U of W researcher Yoshihiro Kawaoka.

In December 2017, the NIH lifted the research moratorium, which affected less than two dozen experiments on three types of virus: influenza, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) virus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome or SARS virus. Some consider it a win for science, in a year that saw such widespread crackdowns on scientific research and information sharing that the Trump administration was accused of waging a war on science with its aggressive and far-reaching bans on climate science, environmental science, and health science, particularly in areas where scientific findings about health and safety threatened to complicate commercial interests.

“I believe nature is the ultimate bio-terrorist and we need to do all we can to stay one step ahead,” said Sam Stanley, President of Stony Brook University and chairman of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity which helped develop the framework for the lifted ban.

Many scientists have raised concerns about experiments involving pathogens that could, even with the most stringent precautions, theoretically escape the lab and pose threats to the general population. The H1N1 influenza strain that circulated from 1977 to 2009 is believed to have originated from a laboratory accident, and in 2014, the CDC closed labs responsible for releasing bird flu and anthrax into the environment. Called gain-of-function (GOF) experiments, the studies aim to understand genetic changes that can make viruses such as the flu easier to transmit.

But some scientists say the viruses could begin that transmission process in the lab. “I am not persuaded that the work is of greater potential benefit than potential harm,” said molecular biologist Richard Ebright of Rutgers University, who says that U.S. labs working with dangerous pathogens suffer regular safety breaches and viruses could infect a lab worker, who would next infect people outside of the lab.

Such a safety or security breach could, theoretically, even be intentional. Michael T. Osterholm, Director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said a virus doesn’t necessarily have to leave the lab to pose a threat. The information gained through research could itself could get into the wrong hands, and should be partially classified, he said.

“If someone finds a way to make the Ebola virus more dangerous, I don’t believe that should be available to anybody off the street who could use it for nefarious purposes,” he said.

So what happens then? The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which issued a framework to guide the lifted ban on research of pandemic pathogens (PPPs), does not offer guidance for situations in which viruses escape from the lab. However, it does provide a clause in which parties would agree to stop all activities in case an accident occurs.

Sleep tight.

More from News

Vivian Wilson
@vivllainous/Instagram

Elon Musk's Trans Daughter Just Made Her Drag Debut At An Anti-ICE Fundraiser—And Fans Are Obsessed

Elon Musk's disowned trans daughter Vivian Jenna Wilson has made a name for herself online for mercilessly dragging the father who once said she was "dead" to him because she was "killed by the woke mind virus."

But recently she took it to a new level, leveraging her fame in her first drag performance at a Los Angeles anti-ICE fundraiser.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

Trump Administration Fast-Tracks Eliminating National Suicide Hotline's LGBTQ+ Youth Support

On Wednesday morning, news broke that the administration of MAGA Republican President Donald Trump was eliminating certain suicide and self harm resources provided through the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.

The lifeline offered callers options to speak to people who specialize in meeting their needs. But the Trump administration decided this was a service that LGBTQ+ young people don't deserve.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Trump Blasted For Announcing New Additions To The White House Lawn As Global Tensions Escalate

President Donald Trump was criticized after announcing that two new flagpoles would be added to the North and South Lawns of the White House—not the greatest look amid heightened global unease as tensions between Israel and Iran ramp up.

According to the Associated Press, Trump watched as a crane installed the newest flagpole on the South Lawn, remarking, “It’s such a beautiful pole.” He later returned to the site to salute as the American flag was raised for the first time.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Donald Trump from CNN supercut
CNN

Trump Mocked For 'Two Weeks' Iran Deadline With Supercut Of All His 'Two Weeks' Promises

President Donald Trump has a history of promising to resolve problems within "two weeks," and a new viral supercut mocks him for all the times he's said as much—including right now with tensions in the Middle East higher than ever.

Trump said Thursday he will decide within two weeks whether to involve U.S. forces directly in the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, citing what he called a “substantial chance” for renewed nuclear negotiations with Tehran.

Keep ReadingShow less
red flag with pole on seashore
Seoyeon Choi on Unsplash

People Break Down The 'Silent Red Flags' Folks Tend To Ignore In Relationships

A red flag has come to mean any warning sign in life, in addition to the literal red flags that are placed on beaches or industrial sites to warn people of danger.

People will respond to situations by saying, "That’s a red flag." But before that language evolved, they'd just call them "warning signs."

Keep ReadingShow less