Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Donald Trump Demonstrates That He Really Doesn't Understand the First Amendment

Donald Trump Demonstrates That He Really Doesn't Understand the First Amendment

That's not how it works.

President Donald Trump expressed his discontent for the United State's libel laws on Wednesday, referring to them as "a sham and a disgrace" before going into a Cabinet meeting.

“We are going to take a strong look at our country’s libel laws so that when somebody says something that is false and defamatory about someone, that person will have meaningful recourse in our courts,” Trump said. “And if somebody says something that’s totally false and knowingly false, that the person that has been abused, defamed, libeled, will have meaningful recourse.”


Trump's comments are a direct response to author Michael Wolff's tell-all book, Fire & Fury, which challenges the president's fitness for office.

The American Civil Liberties Union immediately fired back at the president on Twitter: "Reminder: There are no federal libel laws to “take a strong look at.” There is, however, the First Amendment, which thankfully is safe from Trump. https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/donald-trump-one-man-constitutional-crisis/#libel"

The ACLU goes on to explain that the United States has no federal libel laws, and the president has no power to demand changes to state libel laws: "President Trump’s threat to revise our country’s libel laws is, frankly, not credible. There is no federal libel law, and the president does not have the authority to change state libel laws."

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees citizens' right to free speech and a free press. The United States Supreme court has consistently set a very high standard for how public officials can win a libel suit. "For a public official to win a libel suit, the plaintiff must not only show that the defendant published a false and defamatory statement but that the defendant did so maliciously," according to the ACLU.

"In the 1964 case New York Times v. Sullivan, the court found that a journalist who published erroneous information about a public figure without knowing it was wrong was constitutionally protected," the ACLU wrote on their blog. "In a later case, the court said that if the legal system were to punish all false statements regardless of motive, it could “lead to intolerable self-censorship” by the press."

The ACLU emphasized the unconstitutionality of Trump's threats: "the First Amendment provides strong protections against libel liability, particularly with respect to statements about public figures or matters of public concern. Whatever President Trump might think, he has no power to override these constitutional protections."

The president's comments are nothing new, however. At the height of the 2016 presidential campaign, the former realty TV host promised to “open up our libel laws so when they write purposely negative and horrible and false articles, we can sue them and win lots of money.” Unfortunately for the president, that's not how libel laws work.

Further revealing his disdain for free speech, Trump has also floated the idea of hosting the "Fake News Awards." Since his days on the campaign trail, the president has habitually referred to any negative press coverage as "fake news," especially in regards to Special Counsel Robert Mueller's criminal investigation into possible obstruction of justice by the president. Irony seems lost on the president, who bemoans "fake news" yet has lied more than 2,000 times since taking office.

More from People/donald-trump

Signal app logo; J.D. Vance
Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images; Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Signal's Founder Epically Roasts Vance Over The Disastrous Group Chat Debacle

Signal founder Matthew Rosenfeld, better known by the pseudonym Moxie Marlinspike, mocked Vice President J.D. Vance after the app found itself at the center of the Trump administration's group text scandal.

Rosenfeld's post came amid revelations that Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was invited into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials, particularly Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, discussing military strategy surrounding war strikes in Yemen.

Keep ReadingShow less
MTG, Martha Kelner
C-SPAN

MTG Blasted For Her Unhinged Reaction To A UK Reporter Asking Her A Question

Far right Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene was bashed for viciously shutting down a British reporter who had a question about the Signal group chat scandal, AKA "Signalgate."

Republican President Donald Trump's administration continues to downplay concerns after The Atlantic'seditor-in-chief, Jeffrey Goldberg, was mistakenly added to the Signal messaging app's group chat in which U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth shared with top intelligence officials the specific weapons programs regarding the U.S. war strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshot of Rachel Maddow
MSNBC

Rachel Maddow Gives Trump A Blistering Reality Check After His 'Perfect' Presidency Claims

MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow criticized President Donald Trump after he claimed "we've had two perfect months" to start out his presidency—conveniently downplaying "Signalgate" and ignoring all the scandals that have thus far struck his administration.

You can see his comments to reporters in the video below:

Keep ReadingShow less
train crossing in small town
craig kerwien on Unsplash

People Share Their Most Embarrassing Small Town Stories

I lived most of my life in a very small town in Northern Maine. There were about 200 kids in my high school and there were 56 kids in my graduating class—we were tied with the class of 1961 for the largest class ever.

When the primary employer in town—Pinkham Lumber Mill—shut down, the town got even smaller. Now the senior class is considered large if it reaches double digits.

Keep ReadingShow less
A post-it with "I Quit" written on it over a computer keypad
a yellow notepad on a keyboard
Photo by Nick Fewings on Unsplash

People Reveal Why They Quit Their Job On The First Day

As much as anyone may want to quit a job, at the end of the day it's easier said than done.

For one thing, even if people are working soul-sucking jobs that barely cover expenses, they still can't afford to lose the paycheck, until something better comes along.

Keep ReadingShow less