Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

NASA Removes 'Insensitive' Nicknames For Certain Cosmic Objects To 'Make Science More Inclusive'

NASA Removes 'Insensitive' Nicknames For Certain Cosmic Objects To 'Make Science More Inclusive'
NASA.gov

Many cosmic objects are known to scientists by unofficial nicknames, but not all of those nicknames are created equal. As it turns out, some are downright offensive.

NASA is working to change this by evaluating the nicknames currently in use and making changes to those that are insensitive.


There has been a general trend toward inclusivity and righting past wrongs lately, and NASA is getting in on the action.

In a statement posted on NASA.gov, the agency explained their reasoning for changing the way they refer to these cosmic features whose names are problematic:

"As the scientific community works to identify and address systemic discrimination and inequality in all aspects of the field, it has become clear that certain cosmic nicknames are not only insensitive, but can be actively harmful."
"NASA is examining its use of unofficial terminology for cosmic objects as part of its commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion."

Among those cited as problematic is NGC 2392, a planetary nebula whose nickname includes a term for the Indigenous peoples of the Arctic circle which many find offensive.

The associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate at Headquarters, Thomas Zurbuchen, talked a bit about why the change is important.

"I support our ongoing reevaluation of the names by which we refer to astronomical objects. Our goal is that all names are aligned with our values of diversity and inclusion, and we'll proactively work with the scientific community to help ensure that."
"Science is for everyone, and every facet of our work needs to reflect that value."

NASA will be working with "diversity, inclusion, and equity experts in the astronomical and physical sciences" to review other nicknames and make changes where appropriate.

Unfortunately, much of the reaction to NASA's announcement on social media seems to be people insisting that the change is unnecessary and that NASA is just caving to "woke culture."

It is probably safe to say that these people have never tried to learn about astronomy, only to encounter a celestial object whose name contains a racial slur used against their people.

Stephen T. Shih, Associate Administrator for Diversity and Equal Opportunity at NASA Headquarters also recognized the need for change.

"These nicknames and terms may have historical or culture connotations that are objectionable or unwelcoming, and NASA is strongly committed to addressing them."
"Science depends on diverse contributions, and benefits everyone, so this means we must make it inclusive."

Inclusivity, by its very nature, creates opportunities and embraces people's differences and strengths. It costs nothing to change an offensive name, and is a great first step toward making science more accessible for everyone.

More from Trending

Dean Withers; Emily Wilson
@larryjackmac/TikTok

Conservative Influencer Stuns TikTok By Saying That Slavery Should Be 'State-By-State' Choice

In many ways, we should have all seen the recent election results coming, and chief among the missed signs is how cooked some of Gen Z's brains are.

Though the majority of the age group voted for Kamala Harris, a staggering proportion voted for Donald Trump at a far higher percentage than is typical for the youth vote where Republicans are concerned.

Keep ReadingShow less
surprised
Nachristos on Unsplash

People Describe The Most Unbelievable Coincidences They've Ever Experienced

Coincidence is defined as "a remarkable concurrence—the fact of two or more events or circumstances happening or existing at the same time—of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection."

However, we often don't use the term exactly that way. The requirement of concurrence is often missing in the colloquial usage of "coincidence." We use it more often to mean "something that's not planned or arranged but seems like it is."

Keep ReadingShow less

People Break Down Which Industries Are Far Darker Than Folks Realize

There are certain industries we've all heard of being problematic if not pointedly dark in nature.

But there are industries out there that most people don't realize are dark until they've already gotten involved in them.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump Jasmine Crockett
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images, CNN

Jasmine Crockett Perfectly Calls Out Trump Over Unqualified Cabinet Picks

Democratic Representative Jasmine Crockett exposed the glaring hypocrisy behind President-elect Donald Trump choosing unqualified cabinet members for the incoming administration.

"We are just in uncharted territory," Crockett said on Wednesday's CNN newscast, adding:

Keep ReadingShow less
Dave Coulier on 'Today' show
TODAY

'Full House' Star Dave Coulier Reveals Stage 3 Cancer Diagnosis In Poignant New Interview

Full House actor Dave Coulier shared the devastating news of his stage 3 cancer diagnosis in an interview with Hoda Kotb on the Today show.

The 65-year-old stand-up comic and actor is famous for playing "Uncle" Joey Gladstone in the beloved family sitcom Full House from 1987 to its cancellation in 1995. He reprised the role in the 2016 spin-off series Fuller House.

Keep ReadingShow less