Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Merriam-Webster Is Changing Their Definition Of 'Racism' After Plea From Black Missouri Woman

Merriam-Webster Is Changing Their Definition Of 'Racism' After Plea From Black Missouri Woman
WIN-Initiative/Getty Images; KMOV St. Louis/YouTube

Kennedy Mitchum, a recent college graduate in Missouri, began questioning in the past couple weeks the definition of racism that is presented in the Merriam-Webster dictionary.

Mitchum explained that she's heard many people cite the definition, verbatim, but the use of the definition didn't ring true for the actual depth of the concept being discussed.


Mitchum stated:

"So, a couple weeks ago, I said this is the last argument I'm going to have about this. I know what racism is, I've experienced it time and time and time again in a lot of different ways, so enough is enough. So, I emailed them about how I felt about it. Saying this needs to change."
"With everything going on, I think it's important everyone is on the same page."

Mitchum meant this last statement very literally, as she reached out to the Merriam-Webster staff repeatedly, hoping to make a change.

She hoped with a more complete definition of the term, people will not only talk about it differently, but view the concept differently, too.

Here is the current definition in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:

"Racism is a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race."

Mitchum explained she felt the definition was over-simplified.

"I kept having to tell them that definition is not representative of what is actually happening in the world. The way that racism occurs in real life is not just prejudice it's the systemic racism that is happening for a lot of black Americans."

Mitchum suggested instead:

"I basically told them they need to include that there is systematic oppression on people. It's not just 'I don't like someone,' it's a system of oppression for a certain group of people."

Mitchum heard back from the Merriam-Webster staff.

They agreed to begin drafting a more complete definition of the term that not only includes its current elements, but incorporates systemic use, as well.

An editor of Merriam-Webster, Alex Chambers, stated:

"While our focus will always be on faithfully reflecting the real-world usage of a word, not on promoting any particular viewpoint, we have concluded that omitting any mention of the systemic aspects of racism promotes a certain viewpoint in itself."

You can view more about the staff's thoughts here:

Florissant woman helps change Merriam Webster's definition of racismyoutu.be

Peter Sokolowski, on staff at Merriam-Webster, further explained that the second and third definitions of racism included in the dictionary will be further clarified, as well, in an attempt to fully explore the complexities of race.

Sokolowski stated:

"This is the kind of continuous revision that is part of the work of keeping the dictionary up to date, based on rigorous criteria and research we employ in order to describe the language as it is actually used."

Sokolowski also stated that the team intends to include the definition in their next print-run edition, though probably not before that.

"We are examining the evidence and drafting any revisions accordingly; the revised entry will not be finalized until it's been through our editorial process, and we don't anticipate releasing it to the public before our next dictionary update."

Many Twitter users took heart at the news and Mitchum's efforts.




Chambers was grateful to Mitchum for her persistence in reaching out and sent her a thank-you email.

"This revision would not have been made without your persistence in contacting us about this problem. We sincerely thank you for repeatedly writing in and apologize for the harm and offense we have caused in failing to address the issue sooner. I will see to it that the entry for racism is given the attention it sorely needs."

Though it may not always feel like we're making a big difference by voting, calling our governors, or sending out emails, sometimes we create much more of an impact than we ever thought we would.

More from Trending

Donald Trump holding photos of White House ballroom
Salwan Georges/The Washington Post via Getty Images

CNN Just Used A Hilarious Poll To Show Just How Unpopular Trump's Ballroom Is—And We're Cackling

After President Donald Trump claimed that his new White House ballroom is "very popular" with the American public, CNN shared a hilariously shady poll that gets to the truth of the matter.

Last year, Trump ordered the demolition of the entire East Wing to make way for a 90,000 square-foot ballroom that will dwarf the size of the White House itself, sparking alarm from historical preservationists and the public alike.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots from @devynnehaddoxx's TikTok video
@devynnehaddoxx/TikTok

Woman In Labor Times How Long Her Husband Takes To Poop To See If She Can Push Their Baby Out Faster In Hilarious Viral Video

It's well-known across the internet that it takes forever for men to use the restroom. For dads especially, in the time it takes them to poop, when they return to the house, their kids will have aged seven years, and their baby will have learned to walk.

These are jokes, of course, but it's an internet consensus that men spend a really long time on the porcelain throne.

Keep ReadingShow less
David Letterman (left) has continued defending Stephen Colbert (right) as CBS faces backlash over canceling The Late Show.
Kevin Winter/Getty Images; Gilbert Carrasquillo/GC Images

David Letterman Rips 'Lying Weasels' At CBS For Claiming Colbert Was Canceled For Financial Reasons In Epic Takedown

David Letterman isn’t staying quiet about CBS canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. As Colbert’s run comes to an end later this month, the former late-night host is publicly challenging the network’s claim that the decision was purely financial.

Letterman, who hosted The Late Show from 1993 until stepping down in 2015, addressed the controversy during a new interview with New York Times journalist Jason Zinoman.

Keep ReadingShow less
Antonia Eastwood; Gemma Monk
Antonia Eastwood/MSN; Cover Images

Woman Speaks Out After Prison Sentence To Reveal What Led Her To Hurl Black Paint At Sister-In-Law On Her Wedding Day

In early 2024, 49-year-old Antonia Eastwood married Ashley Monk after about five months of dating. During the ceremony, Antonia tripped while walking down the aisle.

Antonia and Ashley were both suspicious that she did not trip accidentally and that Ashley's sister, Gemma, actually tripped her. Gemma and Antonia were not close, and the couple also believed that Gemma might be jealous that they were marrying after five months, though she'd been with her childhood sweetheart for 20 years without tying the knot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Billie Eilish on 'Good Hang'
Good Hang with Amy Poehler/YouTube

Billie Eilish's Refreshingly Blunt Take On Aging And 'Botched' Plastic Surgery Has Fans Nodding Hard

You know what they say: the grass is greener on the other side. Most people want something that they don't have.

While many people right now are fixated on appearing younger than their age, Billie Eilish—who already looks younger than her age—is looking forward to what comes next.

Keep ReadingShow less