Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

What Is the New 'Harry Potter' Theory About the Dursleys?

What Is the New 'Harry Potter' Theory About the Dursleys?

For fans of the 'Harry Potter' books and films, the treatment of Harry by his legal guardians, the Dursleys, has always left a sour taste in our mouths.


But a theory has emerged and gained traction over the past few years that could put the Dursleys' behavior in persepctive.

So what is the theory, exactly?

Well, it stems from the matter of Horcruxes, which are receptacles into which Voldemort has hidden parts of his evil soul in an attempt achieve immortality.

We come to know later in the series that Harry is actually a sort of Horcrux, and the fact that he has a bit of the Dark Lord living inside of him not only has adverse effects on Harry's demeanor, but potentially the demeanor of those around him as well.

Just as Ron's locket, which also turned out to be a Horcrux, negatively affected his mood and behavior, so could Harry impact the Dursleys' behavior, considering they lived with him for years.

But what about Ron and Hermione? They were Harry's best friends and they didn't seem to be negatively affected by being around him. Proponents of the theory note that Harry spent far more time with the Dursleys than he did with Ron and Hermione at Hogwarts.

At a recent press event for his new movie, Jungle, Daniel Radcliffe was asked about the theory, and he seemed intrigued.

"Oh OK, so it affects the behavior of people around it," Radcliffe said. "That’s interesting, yeah."

"Yeah, that’s definitely the first time I’ve heard that one," he continued. "It’s definitely interesting because it sort of posits a world where these people only know to be a certain way. Actually, if you remove him from the situation, [they] would have been quite a nice, friendly family."

But Radcliffe didn't get that sense when they were filming.

"Having been there for Richard Griffiths’ (Vernon) and Fiona Shaw’s (Petunia) performances, I feel like it was more they just hated having this kid around," he noted.

Radcliffe likes the idea, although he probably isn't the one to ask.

"I think that’s definitely a cool theory," he added. "Has anyone asked Jo Rowling what she thinks of that one yet? I feel like that one ― that’s definitely a good one."

Many fans have been shocked by the theory:

For others, the theory has some holes in it:

One skeptical blogger wrote:

So it has been established that Harry is a Horcrux. And in the seventh book, it is shown that whenever someone wears Salazar Slytherin's locket (another Horcrux) for too long, they become angrier and nastier. The theory says that this explains why the Dursleys were so angry and nasty to Harry. But it doesn't explain why no one else is affected by Harry and the part of Voldemort's soul inside him.

And you being in the proximity of a Horcrux makes you mean and foul to everyone. The Dursleys are all nice to each other, though. And Rowling has said that not only were Petunia and Vernon Dursley always like that, but it was exasperated by the fact that they hated James Potter, who Harry incidentally looks exactly like.

While Rowling has yet to weigh in on the theory, she has previously called the Dursleys "reactionary, prejudiced, narrow-minded, ignorant and bigoted," and noted that their hatred for Harry stemmed from Petunia's jealousy over Harry's mother (her sister) Lily's magical powers and Vernon's dislike of abnormal things.

So perhaps the Dursleys weren't too great to begin with.

But, plausible or not, the theory certainly gives some added weight to their treatment and attitude toward Harry.

Your move, Rowling.

Please SHARE this with your friends and family.

H/T: Huffington Post, Movie Pilot, Twitter

More from Entertainment

Hillary Clinton
Kimberly White/Getty Images for Common Sense Media

Hillary Clinton Has Iconic Reaction To Trump Administration's 'Atlantic' Text Scandal

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had a succinct response after Jeffrey Goldberg—the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic—revealed he was invited into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials discussing military strategy surrounding their war strikes in Yemen.

Goldberg revealed a highly unusual and concerning situation where senior Trump administration officials were allegedly discussing war plans over a group chat on Signal. Goldberg recounted that Representative Mike Waltz added him to an 18-person group chat, which he initially suspected was a hoax or disinformation campaign.

Keep ReadingShow less
Vivian Jenna Wilson; Elon Musk
@vivllainous/TikTok; Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Elon Musk's Trans Daughter Epically Claps Back After Musk Claims His Child 'Died'

Elon Musk's estranged trans daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson, used an iconic soundbite from RuPaul's Drag Race to clap back at Musk's claim that his child had "died."

The SpaceX co-founder responded to a post on X (formerly Twitter) defending Musk for appearing to give the Nazi salute twice at Republican President Donald Trump's inauguration.

Keep ReadingShow less
Screenshots of Mike Myers and Mark Carney
@MarkJCarney/X

Mike Myers Joins Canada's New Prime Minister For Epic Jab At Trump In Viral Video

Actor and comedian Mike Myers has gone viral after joining Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney for a video message that mocks President Donald Trump and his plan to make Canada the 51st state of the United States.

In the Liberal Party skit, Mike Myers and Mark Carney—both dressed in red Canada jerseys—share a moment at a hockey practice. Carney starts off skeptical of Myers, questioning his Canadian credentials since he now lives in the United States, despite being born and raised in Canada.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pete Buttigieg
Alex Wong/Getty Images

Pete Buttigieg Drops F-Bombs After Trump Administration Invites Journalist Into High-Level Military Group Chat

Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg passionately spoke out after Jeffrey Goldberg—the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic—revealed he was invited into a Signal chat with high-level Trump administration officials discussing military strategy surrounding their war strikes in Yemen.

Goldberg revealed a highly unusual and concerning situation where senior Trump administration officials were allegedly discussing war plans over a group chat on Signal. Goldberg recounted that Representative Mike Waltz added him to an 18-person group chat, which he initially suspected was a hoax or disinformation campaign.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump with Easter bunny at 2017 Easter egg roll
Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Trump Blasted After Turning Annual White House Easter Tradition Into Corporate Grift

President Donald Trump has sparked concerns from ethics experts after soliciting corporate sponsors for the annual White House Easter Egg Roll.

Potential sponsors of the April 21 event were presented with three sponsorship options ranging from $75,000 to $200,000, according to a nine-page guide reviewed by The New York Times.

Keep ReadingShow less