Salad Cake
Who knew salad could be so sweet?
Edible Art By Honeycat Cookies
These cookies are simply too beautiful to eat.
Cherry Cake Company
These astounding cake creations are mesmerizing to watch come to life.

Creativity has never looked so delicious.
Who knew salad could be so sweet?
These cookies are simply too beautiful to eat.
These astounding cake creations are mesmerizing to watch come to life.
Influencer Jude Cloud revealed in a video message how he ended up discarding the MAGA conservative beliefs he grew up around, describing his evolution from holding “fiscally conservative, socially liberal” ideals to being a "terribly woke" queer leftist.
Cloud, who boasts nearly 58,000 followers on Instagram, said he actually used to go "door-to-door" stumping for "one of [President Donald] Trump's closest friends in Congress, adding that he "used to say, 'I think, therefore I am conservative.'"
He added that he "used to think that government having its hands in anything was the worst thing that could ever happen to people," though his opinions shifted when he met the woman who would become the mother of his child.
He said:
"I remember I was so excited to talk to her about politics, 'cause I was like, 'Oh, she's gonna hear everything I have to say, and she's gonna think I'm so smart, she's gonna be so impressed by, like, my knowledge and philosophy, whatever.'"
"And I remember I started talking to her about politics and she was like, 'Holy sh*t, you sound so dumb. You sound like a terrible person, like a bad person, like the things you're saying are the things that a bad and evil person would say.'"
"I was like, 'Oh, huh, interesting,' and I stepped back, and I thought about why I believed the things that I did, and tried to think, 'Yeah, would a kind person believe these things?'"
"Take all my personal, take how much money I want to make someday, take how hard I think I work, take all of that away, just think about kindness and being a good person. And I realized, yeah, the beliefs that I was aligning myself with, the beliefs that I was supporting were terrible."
"The reason I'm sharing this story isn't to inherently sh*t on conservatives and the right. I'll always sh*t on MAGA, but to say it's okay to change. It's okay to grow up and it's okay to hold yourself accountable for being wrong. It's okay to say, 'I saw that in the correct way, I'm sorry, and I'll do better, and I'll commit to grow, I'll commit to keep growing and to keep getting better."
Cloud noted that he was "a libertarian and a Republican in 2020 and now I'm so far from that," adding:
"I just hope this reaches people who currently think it's manly and strong and impressive, who think it's macho and manly to be a conservative and to actively support the oppression of more than half of our country."
"You can change. You can get better. It's strong and cool and macho to give a sh*t about other people."
You can hear what he said in the video below.
Cloud's remarks resonated with many.









Chances are many of you have some conservatives in your lives who need to hear this.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is facing heavy criticism after claiming that Americans "want their tax dollars spent on things like" President Trump's $1.8 billion slush fund that may go to his allies and those who participated in the January 6 insurrection.
The Justice Department said last week it was creating the fund as part of a deal in which Trump agreed to drop his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS. But despite a press release, memo, and a newly-released settlement agreement, many details about the program remain unclear.
The agreement states that within 30 days, the so-called “Anti-Weaponization Fund” will establish its own funding structure, rules, conditions, and claim requirements. The DOJ has so far provided few specifics about who qualifies, how applications will be reviewed, or how officials arrived at the fund’s $1.776 billion price tag, besides it being a reference to the nation's 1776 founding.
The department suggested the money is intended for people allegedly targeted because of their political beliefs, and the fund is widely expected to include January 6 insurrectionists among potential recipients. Blanche previously told lawmakers that “anybody could apply,” with decisions left to a panel of commissioners that he will help appoint.
The agreement also says time spent in prison or federal custody because of alleged “lawfare and weaponization” from “any source” could factor into compensation decisions.
When asked for a response to Americans who are "upset" by the news of this fund's existence, Blanche offered the following absurd defense:
"If you're just upset, you're not getting a dime. On the other hand, I think if you said to the American taxpayer that there is a horrible wrong committed by your government and now you can apply and you can have your lawyers' fees back, you can be compensated financially, what American would say, 'Oh my gosh, that's terrible'?"
"I very much disagree with the idea that the American taxpayer is indignant about the fact that a victim of weaponization, a victim who suffered, whether it was legal fees, [they] lost a job, had their life turned upside down in a way that was not appropriate. If it was appropriate, there would be no compensation."
“I do not think the American people have issues with that. To the contrary, I think they do want their tax dollars spent on things like that.”
You can hear what Blanche said in the video below.
Blanche also dismissed concerns that insurrectionists convicted for their part in the 2021 Capitol riot would take advantage of the fund.
The attack left at least five people dead and resulted in over 100 injuries to law enforcement as well as millions of dollars in damages after insurrectionists stormed the Capitol building in an attempt to stop the certification of then-President-elect Joe Biden's decisive electoral victory.
Upon taking office last year, Trump granted clemency to all 1,500+ individuals charged in the insurrection, upending what had been the largest prosecution in Justice Department history, freeing individuals captured on camera brutally assaulting police officers as well as leaders of far-right extremist groups convicted of plotting violent efforts to halt the peaceful transfer of power.
Despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the administration and its surrogates have attempted to paint the attack as a peaceful gathering of law-abiding citizens—and Blanche brushed aside suggestions that people convicted of assaulting law enforcement officers should automatically be barred from receiving money from the fund.
He said:
“To be clear, people that hurt police get money all the time. It’s abhorrent to ever, ever touch a law enforcement officer, which is why anytime anybody does that and it’s a federal officer, we’ll prosecute them. But that’s a completely different question, with whether an individual is allowed to apply for a claim.”
Nonetheless, former Capitol Police Harry Dunn and Metropolitan Police Officer Daniel Hodges— both of whom helped defend the U.S. Capitol during the attack—have already filed a lawsuit in Washington seeking to block the creation and funding of the program.
The possibility that those who attacked the nation's seat of government could be compensated using Americans' tax dollars is in fact very unpopular, and Blanche was swiftly called out for suggesting it isn't a point of contention.
Blanche's defense of the fund has been scorned by Democrats and has thus far not swayed Republicans.
His trip to Capitol Hill on Thursday—the day after his CNN interview—proved fruitless, with senators reportedly emerging from the meeting frustrated and largely unwilling to speak publicly.
Lawmakers later scrapped plans for a vote and instead began their Memorial Day recess early, a move that could make it even harder for Republicans to pass party-line legislation in the weeks ahead, particularly as Trump continues to clash with incumbent senators and with the midterms on the horizon.
One idea Republicans reportedly floated to narrow the settlement fund would have prevented January 6 defendants convicted of assaulting police officers from collecting payouts. Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters he was "not a big fan" and did not see "a purpose" for the fund.
Getting a new pet is a big commitment, and when you decide to take the plunge, you should commit to keeping them for their full lifetime.
But if you're going to get an animal that you have no prior experience with, you also have to commit to doing your research so you can care for them properly. While getting advice from a fellow pet owner is helpful, it's always good to double-check their facts.
That's exactly where Khloé Kardashian went wrong when she decided to adopt her pair of cats, Baby Kitty and Grey.
On her Khloé in Wonder Land podcast during her "Inside My Brain" episode, Kardashian opened up about her first experience with having cats in her home, and she admitted she'd made a big mistake.
Kardashian reflected:
"I was really misadvised about getting my cats declawed."
"I've never owned cats before. I didn't even know that was a thing."
For those who do not know, cats can have their claws surgically removed. This was a really common procedure in the early 2000s, because it prevented cats from damaging property or accidentally scratching their owners and other pets. Typically, the nails would only be removed from the front feet, though removing them from the back feet is possible.
In recent years, however, declawing has been massively criticized, as removing a cat's nail is the equivalent of removing part of a human's finger, specifically from the tip of the finger to past the first knuckle.
Not only is this painful for a cat, but it also takes away from them their ability to naturally defend themselves, climb, and hunt. Recent research has also found that declawing can affect a cat's long-term ability to balance, walk, run, and play, negatively impacting their sociability and increasing their chances of developing arthritis at a younger than average age.
Kardashion admitted to being concerned about her cats' decreased quality of life after the procedure:
"I feel really, really terrible that I did go in this direction."
"I feel like that's why my cats are miserable, and it was at my doing."
"My cats wear AirTags, like, they're not allowed to even go near a door, because I'm so afraid if they get out, they'll have no way to defend themselves. They've lost their protection tools, so it makes me so sad."
You can watch that part of the podcast episode here:
- YouTubeyoutu.be
The podcast episode was shared on the "LA Influencer Snark" subReddit, where Redditors were critical of Kardashian's lack of research and preparation for having cats, not to mention her misuse of resources that other pet owners do not have.
"So sad and unnecessary. She has the resources to have someone groom and clip the cat’s nails weekly." - Intelligent_Mall222
"And she can easily afford to replace furniture or get it fixed. I would be less judgmental of a less wealthy person doing this to their cat because they can’t just buy new things on a whim." - PM_ME_YOUR_TATERTOTS
"There are even nail caps I’ve seen people use to protect furniture or scratching other pets and people if that’s what she is concerned about… so many things she could have done that are better than this…" - peanutbutterybaybay
"It’s just disgusting... It’s equivalent to cutting a human’s fingers off their hand. She has all the money in the WORLD to keep her cat maintained, yet chooses the cruel option. I truly don’t know why society chooses to keep these id**ts rich." - Conscious-Owl7277
"It’s pure laziness; she thinks her material possessions are worth mutating a poor cat. Calabasas, Malibu, and Agoura Hills (basically the wealthy neighborhoods they live in) are small towns, and we have AMAZING vets and great animal groomers and caregivers."
"I can find someone who can come to her house and trim the kitties' nails in about five minutes. But no, it’s her pure entitlement and disregard for others that made her jump to this disgusting conclusion." - darkcherrykiss
"There are even fabrics that are resistant to cat scratching! We have crappy Ashley furniture couches, and our cat has been scratching them daily since she was a kitten, so three and a half years of scratching, but there’s barely any damage (these couches should be destroyed)."
"I thought it was some kind of sorcery until I looked it up, and apparently there are fabrics that are scratch resistant! There’s also fabrics that don’t feel good on their paws, which will deter scratching."
"There’s zero excuse for declawing, period. You can find a solution that doesn’t involve mutilating your pet." - panicnarwhal
"Ironically, she wears four-inch FAKE nails, yet has the claws ripped from her cats. Sorry if I’m being dramatic, but this is disgusting." - karishexplains
"Declawing a cat is seriously evil. I rescued a declawed cat, and the poor girl had terrible arthritis in her paws."
"At the very least, Khloe could have tried claw caps. THEY MAKE SPARKLY ONES THAT COULD MATCH HER OWN STUPID NAILS, FOR F**K'S SAKE."
"It's even worse that she talks about this publicly, and that will normalize it for some people." - No_Nefariousness3866
"I find it so gross that these people keep their pets as accessories instead of as companions and family members."
"Our beloved dog died on my husband's lap early Monday morning. He didn’t make a sound. He just stopped breathing with his dad’s hand on his chest."
"We cremated him at 4:30 today. My husband just says, ‘He was just no longer with us’ many times a day. It’s the first time I’ve seen him weep in 17 years. He hasn’t stopped."
"I’ll never understand people who have pets they don’t love. How could you not?" - keekspeaks
"I'm scared of cats cutting me, too, and I can't afford to replace furniture if they destroy it. You know what I did? BLESS THEM, BUT I DIDN'T GET A F**KING CAT, KHLOE." - eatheapples
Kardashian may not have realized what she was doing, but she should have researched the procedure and possible side effects instead of taking someone else's word for it.
This is what happens, though, when people aren't ready to commit to being a pet owner and treat their pet more like an accessory instead.
A Mississippi high school is under fire for the vile bigotry to which they have subjected their salutatorian for being trans.
In a since-deleted post on its Facebook account, D'Iberville High School in Biloxi, Mississippi, posted a photo of salutatorian Jonas Hole that had been photoshopped to feminize his appearance.
The photo, seen below, showed Hole in his ROTC uniform, but with his mustache having been very clearly blurred off of his face. The school also used Hole's pre-transition name instead of his current one, an anti-trans practice called "deadnaming."
The post read:
“Pride. Tradition. Excellence. Congratulations to our DHS Salutatorian, [deadname] Hole!"
"Your hard work, dedication, and commitment to excellence have truly paid off."
"You have set the standard through your perseverance, leadership, and determination, and we could not be more proud of all you have accomplished.”
The post immediately went viral as irate commenters criticized the school and exposed the way they seemed to have altered Hole's appearance.
According to the The Advocate, local Biloxi drag performer and LGBTQ+ rights advocate Tara Shay Montgomery shared a selfie of Hole in his uniform clearly showing his mustache.
She also told the outlet Hole was not the only student targeted by the school over their gender identity.
“Several concerned moms of friends of Jonas reached out to me initially about a total of around 6 students excluded from their senior yearbook due to gender specific dress code policies."
"Then the Jonas post from DHS dropped and one of the same moms shared it with me and my stomach dropped in anger disgust and sadness for him.”
Perhaps contrary to what one would expect from a Mississippi community, the overwhelming response to the post about Hole was anger towards the school for humiliating a literal child.
One commenter wrote:
“Imagining diminishing a child’s accomplishments like this."
Another wrote:
“All of that recognition for his hard work, dedication, commitment to excellence, setting standards, determination, countless hours of effort etc. All of this is just disingenuous when you can’t do the bare minimum and respect JONAS."
A Facebook post about the matter from local media outlet Mississippi Television drew several similar reactions, though they were sadly in the minority.






Montgomery says a peaceful protest outside D'Iberville High School has been planned to show support for Jonas and represent the local LGBTQ+ community in the face of bigotry.
She said:
“We feel it’s important to meet them where they are, in their current circumstances and surroundings, to show up for them and not just in a bubble of a safe space."
"They need to know we are there in real life. Not just at Pride!”
Several comments on other posts about the incident accused Hole of having a "mental illness," a common refrain among transphobic bigots, but there is perhaps nothing more "mentally ill" than supporting the harassment and humiliation of child. May they all get the help they so obviously need.
President Donald Trump had a hilariously brutal response after a reporter asked him if he planned to attend the wedding of his son Donald Trump Jr. in the Bahamas this weekend, saying the event is "not good timing for me."
Trump Jr.—who was previously engaged to current U.S. Ambassador to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle—will marry Palm Beach socialite Bettina Anderson this weekend, but Trump made it pretty clear the event isn't exactly at the top of his list of priorities, pointing to the war in Iran and "other things" that are keeping him busy.
He told reporters:
"He'd like me to go, but it's gonna be just a small little private affair, and I'm gonna try and make it. I said, you know, this is not good timing for me. I have a thing called Iran and other things."
"That's one I can't win on. If I do attend, I get killed. If I don't attend, I get killed. By the fake news, of course."
Even weirder, Trump described his own child as "a person I've known a very long time":
"He’s a person I’ve known for a long time. I hope they have a great marriage."
You can hear what Trump said in the video below.
Considering Trump’s golf outings have cost taxpayers at least $101.2 million in travel and security expenses since he returned to office—he's made over 60 trips since beginning his second term—to hear that his own son's wedding doesn't fit into his schedule is wild.
His response said pretty much everything you need to know about the relationship he has with his own kid—and social media users are cackling.
Given that Trump referred to his son as "a person," it seems pretty clear the relationship between father and son is a very, very distant one no matter how Trump Jr. likes to present it.
Recently, Trump Jr. was called out after sharing a video of his arrival at the White House from Mar-a-Lago via Marine One for a "sleepover at dad's house," sparking heavy criticism.
Aside from the fact that the White House is not Trump’s personal property—it is a federally maintained public building that belongs to the American people—Trump Jr.'s fawning post shows he's really trying to get his father's attention... and failing, if his wedding is anything to go by.